Wow!! I have a shit load of questions. I don't believe this is real but man it would be so bad ass if it were.
water and jet fuel dont mix, yea yea yea yea
yea yea yea your a dumbass
photoshop...easy to put wings on a S/A missle...
yeah i think cirrhosis is right ('cept subs dont launch s/a missilies, they launch icbms). look at where the flames are coming out, there's no rocket motor visible, n it'd take a sizeable one to do this. prob a good CG job on some actual Polaris launch footage. would be cool tho.
i just checked my beer.......maybe i should stop drinking
its a jet photoshpped over a missle
uhhh hello dumbass if a missile can go underwater a jet can do the same
besides, with the technology the gov has i wouldnt be surprised if it was real
must scare the shit outta the whales. Poor whales
I fly my jet under water all the time. god you guys are stupid
are u for real? what the fuck are u thinking, i mean come on..........
IF that was a real aircraft it wouldn't make it too far. Jets have jet engines, missles have rocket engines. Missles travel at speeds that would rip the wings off conventional aircraft. Missle speeds are miles per second, jets can't touch that, not even close! Good photoshop skills tho
IF ITS HERE ON CRAZYSHIT.COM IT MUST BE REAL. YEA RIGHT. LETS SEND THAT THING AFTER BIN LADEN
i tried to see if my chopper would go under water and all ya'll cussed me out......
i think i saw that on the new james bond movie yea yea yea
the thing that we saw is not what it seems
testing 1,2,3 testing 1,2,3 laser check 2112-
also a jet engine doesn't spew smoke from its after burners!
NICE thats where our tax dollars are going. I say they are well spent, now if only I could go for a ride in one of those new attack planes that would be VERY NICE. Imagine the "G FORCE" upon the ignition of the after burners.
?... no s/a missles fron subs? I thought ..nevermind...
OKAY lets all goto school:
1. it would not be photoshop. Photoshop is for working with photos. For this you would need a product like Adobe AfterEffects
2. ICBMs, intercontinental missiles are not launched from submarines, SLBMs(submarine launched ballistic missile). How many submarines do you find in the middle of a continent?
3. This is an F-15, water like that would destroy the turbines.
4. The navy is working an unmanned jet that does just this, the Cormorant project. Probably led by DARPA and Boeing.
5. NASA's X-43 Hyper-X broke the SR-71As record by going 6,750 mph, that is nearly 1.9 miles a second. And of coarse the Columbia reentered many times coming in at 17,000 mph. Also missiles do have wings, and they don't get torn off.
dam ichy now that you told us this do you have to kill us????????
Fuckin' well put Ichy!
I would add that if a sub COULD carry a F-16...It would be about ALL that it could carry. There's just not enough room on any subs in the US arsenal to pull that one off. - And what you guys said!
still looked cool tho
Thanks for the education ichy...I was drunk last night at 12:28...
Hey ichy, you dipshit, you misspelled "course"
my balls are ichy think ill wash them yea yea yea yea yea yea oh yea FUCK YOU ASSHOLES
uh bigpoppa.. i think thats a one way jet...
Well, technically I did not misspell anything, I simply used the wrong heteronym. If I misspelled it, it would look something like 'cuorse'. So go suck it. ;)
It is a cool vid though, well done. Even though it has been around for years now, nearly impossible to tell it is a fake without knowing the background of the technologies. Oh and yeah, if I misspell a word, it is because I am now an engineer. We are legaly prohibitted from using correct grammar.
IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO FLY THROUGH SPACE REALLY FAST. ALIENS WOULD BE HERE,
Looks very fake and is not possible. Unlike rockets/missles which can operate in a vacum because they carry onboard oxidizer, jet engines are air breathing, meaning they do not work under the water or in space or at really high altitudes or anywhere else it cannot get a high enough air flow through its engines. Secondly, jet engines don't leave a fire trail behind the same way a rocket does. If you look closely you can even see the smoke and "jet" sliding around.
Alex is right, to accomplish this I would think they would have to use a completely different engine when breaking the water then when in flight. Though in this video, that would be one hell of a ride.
so let me get this straight theres a fucking runway under the water? u who think this is real go die cause theres no point for u to b alive its a fucking jet photoshopped over a slbm or Submarine-launched ballistic missile
ichy is so wrong. 1. you can edit mpegs in photoshop, each frame is a photo. 2.icbm's can be fired from a sub. i've been there and done that. 3. it's not a f-15 it's a y-22 raptor. 4. the cormorant was scrapped. 5. the spaceshuttle doesn't fly, it glides at 17,300 nautical miles/hr. I also have proof that we have never actually landed on the moon. It was in fact all filmed on a sound stage in Irvine CA. It's in my will to release the tape when I kick the bucket.
ok .so this could be a trick vid,i been looking at this footage for a while now,the reason being is the way the water breaks and crashes at the expected width of the plane,what what says this is a hoax (for me -anyway) is the flair from the boosters,it clearly looks like it should be from a rocket,IF it was real ,the sub would be just below the water-line and the plane would be projectiled up and out yousing EXTERNAL BOOST LAUNCHERS ,and its air in-take valves would be hydraulicly closed until opening at the right time ,a second before its thrust after burners ignite (it does waver a bit ,asif its not yet perfected) BUT it heinsite i agree its a fake,
i dont know a fecking thing about rockets or planes OR spelling .ive just viewed the footage again and its defenately a load of kack !